In June of last year, I received
on Facebook a challenge to list ten recordings, or as the instructions put it, ‘favo[u]rite
albums’. ‘What really made an
impact,’ the rubric continued, ‘and is still on your rotation list [?? whatever
that may have been: I never did find out], even if only now and then? Post the
cover, no need to explain. Nominate a person each day to do the same.’ Often I
ignore such ‘challenges’, but in this case I accepted, not least on account of
the friend who had issued this particular call to action. I posted an ‘album’
cover each day, then decided to continue to twenty, then to fifty, and so on. I
had firmly resolve to stop at 100, then 200, then 366 (one for each day of a
well-endowed year), before finally, this month, deciding to quit whilst ahead
at 500. Initially, I avoided any replication of works, then slightly relaxed
that, thinking it perverse to exclude a recording simply because it included a
different performance of three minutes of music, then there were seventy-odd
unrepresented elsewhere. After 366, I permitted myself a little more
repetition, selecting some second recordings of ‘central’ repertoire works that
meant a great deal to me, whilst continuing to present many more works for the
first time. Having drawn to a close, I decided to share the covers with a wider
world, for anyone who might be interested.
What
I should like to say before doing so is that the selection is necessarily
restricted. First, and most obviously, it is restricted to recordings that I
own. However good some alternative may be, if I do not, for whatever reason, it
will not even have been considered for inclusion. The selection is also weighted
very strongly towards a time when, before attending more live performances, I acquired
recordings far more regularly than I do now: mostly of ‘historical’ repertoire.
There are some more recently issued recordings, but not so many. It is also
necessarily restricted to works that have been recorded, and to artists who
have recorded particular works. Much music that interests me, especially new
music, is not present at all. Likewise, there are culpably few recordings of
music by women composers; that, I am afraid, is a reflection of the CDs I own,
though not a reflection of what interests me in live performance, something
nowadays considerably more important to me. The absence of other musical traditions is similarly not intended as a comment upon them. Put simply, I mean no harm with this, and hope to Mozart that it will not offend anyone. I shied away from large boxed sets, since that rather seemed to defeat the point; a recording of the Ring is one thing, a set of 50 different Klemperer recordings another. They are also all audio-only recordings: no videos. This is not a list of ‘500 greatest
recordings’, or some such nonsense; it is not a guide of recommended recordings of particular work; it is simply a selection that grew over time, of
recordings meaning something to me, which attempts not to overlap too often. I hope that it may prove of some interest to some people; if not, other websites are available...
(It also appears that the number may not be precisely 500. I am not at all sure how that happened, but never mind: it is certainly c.500. Too much precision can be a deadly thing.)
1 comment:
Bravo! Fascinating, as lists always are to us collectors. Not a surprise to note the breadth of the repertoire, and the respectability of the artists. 500 is a pretty generous number, so most of the usual suspects are incorporated, although it would have to be said that my mental checklist of my own collection does not probably include more than a third or maybe half of your specific items. Have you attempted to organize a written listing which might then permit one to note gaps or other surprising anomalies? I saw no Haydn sonatas, no Schubert sonatas, no Sibelius, no Shostakovich, and no Puccini and not much if any Verdi. -Dennis
Post a Comment