Images: ROH/Clive Barda |
Royal Opera House
The Dutchman – Bryn Terfel
Senta – Adrianne PieczonkaDaland – Peter Rose
Erik – Michael König
Mary – Catherine Wyn-Rogers
Steersman – Ed Lyon
Tim
Albery (director)
Daniel
Dooner (revival director)Michael Levine (set designs)
Constance Hoffmann (costumes)
David Finn (lighting)
Chorus
of the Royal Opera House (chorus master: Renato Balsadonna)
Orchestra
of the Royal Opera HouseAndris Nelsons (conductor)
I
wonder whether we need a new way of thinking – and talking – about operatic ‘revivals’.
Perhaps the term is more meaningful when it comes to works that have been dead
and buried for years, before being rediscovered by subsequent generations.
However, when it comes to productions, I cannot help but think that it increasingly
obscures rather than aids understanding. Where, after all, has the production
been in the mean time? Hades? More to the point, though, I think we tend to
underestimate, at least in many cases, the role of the revival director. (The often
problematical ‘repertory’ system employed in many German theatres is a
different matter; I am thinking here of theatres operating according to what is
essentially a stagione principle.) In
this particular case, Daniel Dooner seemed to make a better job of ‘reviving’
Tim Albery’s production of The Flying Dutchman
than Albery had made of presenting it in the first place. Or was it a matter of
a better-adjusted cast? The one does not exclude the other, of course; indeed,
the two are not unlikely to have been related.
Steersman (Ed Lyon) |
The
2009
‘premiere’ had greatly disappointed, eschewing Wagner’s interest in myth
for a form of dreary realism, quite out
of place and seemingly determined – understandably, I suppose, given its
misguided premise – to downplay the figure of the Dutchman as much as possible.
It did not make sense and it did not involve. The irritants have not entirely
gone away, especially during the third act, in which the drunken antics of the
townsfolk – here, it must be admitted, very well portrayed by the chorus and Ed
Lyon’s Steersman – still seem to be far too much ‘the point’. But they are
counterbalanced and, on occasion, supplanted by a stronger sense of the
Dutchman’s plight and its consequences. ‘Revival’ seems something of a misnomer
for a hugely beneficial shift of emphasis, unless we mean that the work itself
experiences something of a revival – which, I think, it does, at least vis-à-vis
its outing six years ago.
Bryn
Terfel’s performance certainly seems less ‘revived’ than brought to life for
the first time. In 2009, he had disappointed perhaps even more than the
production. There were still occasional unwelcome tendencies towards crooning,
especially towards the end of his first-act monologue. They were occasional,
though, and Terfel followed up his excellent
Proms Walküre Wotan – almost certainly
the best thing I have heard him sing – with a world-weary Dutchman who, moments
of tiredness aside, yet had powers of something mysterious in reserve for when
the moment called. This time the words
were not only crystal-clear – always a formidable weapon in Terfel’s armoury –
but invested with a true sense of dramatic meaning. Adrianne Pieczonka’s
Senta was at least his equal in terms of dramatic commitment; arguably, this
thrilling, unmistakeably womanly performance went still further. I say ‘womanly’ since this was a reading that
seemed thoroughly in keeping with a recent, welcome understanding of Wagner’s
earlier heroines to be more than virginal male projections. Peter Rose made the
most of Daland’s character: venal, yes, but also looking to the future for his
daughter as well as himself. Michael König offered an alert Erik, Catherine
Wyn-Rogers a properly maternal Mary. Often threatening to steal the show was
Lyon’s Steersman, as fine a portrayal as I can recall: an everyman, perhaps,
but one with agency, for which verbal and musical acuity alike should be
thanked.
Senta (Adrianne Pieczonka) and Erik (Michael König) |
Andris
Nelsons’s conducting for the most part brought out the best from the Orchestra
of the Royal Opera House. However, the interpretation as a whole did not seem
quite to have settled; I strongly suspect that subsequent performances will
impress more. The Flying Dutchman is
a difficult work to bring off; despite fashionable claims for overplaying its
(alleged) antecedents, it really works best as a whole when viewed, as Wagner
would later do so, in the light of his subsequent musico-dramatic theories.
Senta’s Ballad may not originally have been its dramatic kernel, but it has
become so. Nelsons sometimes seemed unclear which way to tilt, especially
during a drawn-out Overture, whose extremes of tempo threatened to negate any
sense of unity. There were sluggish passages elsewhere: not hugely drawn out,
but enough to make one wonder where the music was heading. The third act
emerged tightest, and may well be a pointer to what audiences will hear later
in the run. Choral singing was not entirely free of blurred edges, but there
was much to admire, and again, I suspect that slight shortcomings will soon be
overcome. This remained an impressive ‘revival’, all the more so, given its
manifest superiority to the production’s first outing.