Wigmore Hall
Bartók – Fifteen Hungarian Peasant Songs
Eight
Improvisations of Hungarian Peasant Songs, op.20Sonata
Bartók – Three Hungarian Folksongs from Csík
Kurtág – Pieces from Játékok, interspersed with:
Bartok –
Sonatina; Pieces from Mikrokosmos,
vol.5
Bartók – Six Romanian Folk Dances
Six months
ago, at the end of Pierre Boulez’s ninetieth-anniversary year and thus shortly
before his death, Cédric Tiberghien gave a Wigmore Hall recital in which he
interwove works by Boulez and Bartók. Alas, I was unable to attend, but this
recital, in which he did something similar with Kurtág, made up for some of that
disappointment.
I say ‘interwove’,
but the first half was devoted entirely to Bartók. For so fine a pianist, and
so fine a composer of music involving the piano, there is not so much solo
piano music as one might expect; or rather, there is not much larger-scale
piano music. Even the Sonata, heard here as conclusion to the first half, is
relatively brief. Before that, we heard two sets of short pieces. First came
the Fifteen Hungarian Peasant Songs,
which Bartók groups into four sections – so not entirely unlike a sonata, with
a broad – too broad? – understanding of the term. Tiberghien’s opening, with
the first of the ‘Four Old Tunes’, was bold, his generous use of the sustaining
pedal providing its own atmospheric justification. Following that mini-‘overture’,
we heard Debussyan echoes turned to Lisztian ends, a keen sense of form
exhibiting itself throughout. The Scherzo, no.5, once again showed post-Debussyan
awareness, whilst retaining very much its own character. The ‘Ballad’, a theme
and variations, was exploratory in a way that made it sound close to the (contemporaneous)
Wooden Prince, whilst also looking
forward to the Piano Concertos. Variation form inevitably brought echoes of
Beethoven too. The ‘Old Dance Tunes’ certainly danced, and danced with great
individuality. (Think of Mozart’s exquisite sets of dances, which only sound
the same to those who are not listening.) Liszt was never far away; when is he
in Bartók?
The Eight Improvisations on Hungarian Peasant
Songs arguably offer more of Bartók ‘himself’, but I am not sure the
distinction is an especially illuminating one. Music is music; it is good or
bad, or perhaps something in between. This is good, as was Tiberghien’s
performance. The first number bore a nostalgia born of still greater mastery,
wonderfully conjured up by the pianist with great depth of tone (and, I think,
of soul). Mood swings were skilfully integrated in the ‘Molto capriccioso’;
here, and not here, I wondered whether there might be something of Bartók
answering the aphoristic Schoenberg of the op.19 Six Little Piano Pieces. Schoenberg again came to mind in the
penultimate piece, ‘Sostenuto, rubato’, Tiberghien luxuriating in its
foreshortened or threatened languor, whilst maintaining a sense of urgency. The
‘sound’ is, of course, nothing like Schoenberg, but perhaps there is something
of a commonality of spirit. Bartók’s closing ‘Allegro’ was properly climactic,
Tiberghien striking a fine balance between deliberation, disjuncture, and
rhythmic propulsion.
The Sonata
undoubtedly showed the composer of the first two Piano Concertos at work.
Tiberghien brought the world of the 1920s very much to the fore; rhythmic
comparisons with Stravinsky more than once suggested themselves. In some
senses, this is more ‘abstract’ or ‘cosmopolitan’ music, but one can make too
much of such oppositions. Integration is more the thing, as it was here in
performance too. ‘Sostenuto’ was the word that came to mind before I checked
Bartók’s marking for the second movement: ‘Sostenuto e pesante’. Disruptions thereby
sounded all the more telling when they came. Build-up to climaxes that were
perhaps never quite climactic was unerringly shaped. Kinship and yet also
difference from the earlier ‘folk’ music was apparent in the finale. Likewise
Bartók’s internationalism that yet incorporates elements of the ‘national’.
Perhaps that is another way of saying the same thing. With an almost
Schoenbergian wealth of information and Mozartian melodic profusion, this made
for a thrilling conclusion.
Three Hungarian Folksongs from Csík opened the second half. Charming,
unquestionably beautiful, they were definitely ‘earlier’ than that we had heard
before. There then followed two of the several pieces extracted from Kurtág’s Játékok. Musical procedure was very much
to the fore, Webern-like, in the ‘Hommage à Bartók’. Sonority there and in ‘All’ongherese
– Hommage à Gösta Neuwirth 60’ was forever startling, in all manner of ways,
Tiberghien’s advocacy as focused as one could wish for. ‘Bagpipes’ could be
seen as well as heard in Bartók’s Sonatina,
likewise the bears of the ‘Bear Dance’. Tiberghien offered a warm yet pristine
performance, sounding retrospectively as an intensification of Kurtág’s
post-Webern explorations. Petrushka
sounded in the finale, even before I had noticed the cunning follow-up of
Kurtág’s ‘Hommage à Ferenc farkas (3) – (evocation of Petrushka)’. In the next
three Kurtág pieces, we heard him out-Weberning Webern (‘five-finger play – chromatic
exercise), doing just what the title suggested (‘Pen drawing, Valediction to
erszébet Scháar), and going still further with the out-Weberning Webern (‘Russian
Dance’).
Tiberghien
then interspersed selections from Mikrokosmos
with further selections from Játékok.
The first Bartók six (122-127) suggested the falsity of another opposition:
this time between technical and ‘musical’ requirements. Likewise the coherence
of apparent irregularity. Humour shone through in Kurtág’s ‘La Fille aux
cheveux de lin – enragée’, all the more so for being played with all the
seriousness of Bartók’s post-Debussyan essays. Radical contrast, whether in
simplicity (‘A flower for Márta’) or something akin to miniature Boulez (‘Face
to face (János Demény in memoriam)’), ensued.
Bartok’s
nos 128-33 seemed very much to set the scene for the next selection from Játékok, which also drew again on that
Debussyan inheritance, in an utterly novel way (so it sounded here, anyway). ‘Process’
and ‘music’ were again shown to be as one in Bartók’s nos 134-39, ravishingly
performed as part of a particularly fine-woven tapestry. The final three pieces
by Kurtág seemed very much to come as fulfilment of so many of the tendencies
heard earlier: fine programming and performance. At times almost de profundis, and yet also with what one
might call a bearable lightness of being, Tiberghien resolved so much – and yet
also left so much open – in ‘The very last conversation with Lászo Dörnyei’.
Bartók’s Six Romanian Folk Dances
could then sound as almost a written-in encore. If I have taken until now to
mention Tiberghien’s fineness of touch, that is probably because it never drew
attention to itself.