Holland Park Theatre
Herman – Peter Wedd
Lisa – Natalya RomaniwCountess – Rosalind Plowright
Count Tomsky – Richard Burkhard
Prince Yeletsky – Grant Doyle
Polina – Laura Woods
Masha – Daisy Brown
Chekalinsky – Aled Hall
Surin – Simon Wilding
Governess – Laura Zigmantaite
Chaplitsky – Oliver Brignall
Narumov – Henry Grant Kerswell
Master of Ceremonies – Timothy Langston
Rodula Gaitanou (director)
Cordelia Chisholm (designs)Simon Corder (lighting)
Jamie Neale (choreography)
Opera Holland Park Chorus
(chorus master: Philip Voldman)
City of London SinfoniaPeter Robinson (conductor)
The
Queen of Spades has been
doing rather well in and around London of late. I have only seen two stagings
recently before this, but know of quite a few others. Of those: Opera North offered a rare lapse at the Barbican,
about which the less said, the better; ENO, last year, offered strong vocal performances but a
truly catastrophic production. All in all, then, Holland Park, as so often,
came off best.
Rodula Gaitanou’s production
tells the story well, and offers some probing beneath the surface – although
not so much when contrasted with reports of Stefan Herheim’s recent staging in
Amsterdam. (By the same token, however, OHP does a great deal with more limited
resources; it would in any case be unreasonable or downright absurd to expect
every opera production to be an event on the level of a Herheim production.) I
did wonder whether the sight of two men beneath an arch in the penultimate
scene was intended as an oblique reference to Tchaikovsky’s homosexuality, but,
given the darkness, it was a bit difficult to tell. Perhaps that is the point.
There is, in the late-nineteenth-century updating – time of composition, I
presume – some sense of pitting a self-consciously beautiful society against
more human desires, noble and base alike. Cordelia Chisholm’s designs will
certainly delight those who wish to see ‘traditional’ productions, doubtless
ignoring the fact that the opera is not set when it ‘should’ be.
The Countess seems to rule the
roost in a fashion beyond what one might expect; this is, perhaps, an ageing
society, unable to accept the need to change. If I felt that some of those
points might have been pushed a little harder, there is something to be said
for not doing so either. We all have particular tastes, and have no right to
insist that everything should be as we should have done it; indeed, we should
be willing to learn from things done differently – and done well. I found that,
on reflection, the production had more to offer than I had initially thought;
there is certainly much to be said for relative subtlety. (Just as there is much
to be said, from time to time, for agitprop!)
It was, perhaps inevitably,
Rosalind Plowright’s Countess who made the strongest dramatic impression.
Although she does not have very much to sing during the first act – here,
Tchaikovsky’s three acts were condensed into two – she held the stage just by
entering, let alone by painfully, agonisingly, walking across it with her
sticks. (I thought a little of my first encounter with Waltraud Meier in the
theatre: as Ortrud as Covent Garden. The character has little to sing at all in
the first act of Lohengrin, but I
could not keep my eyes off her.) And the insight into her interior life, above
all to her past, was moving, evoking an historical canvas far wider than we
were explicitly or even implicitly told. Natalya Romaniw did not disappoint as
Lisa, although I felt that her character came more into its own following the
interval; a freer, more daring performance to be seen and heard. Again, perhaps
that was the point. Peter Wedd’s Herman was, I am afraid, harder to like. The
character seemed less impetuous than annoying, somewhat generalised, even
wooden acting meaning that it was difficult to feel much chemistry between him
and his beloved. As melodrama there was something to be said for such a
performance, but there was much that it lacked; a fine vocal performance might
have compensated, but that was not to be either. Grant Doyle’s Yeletsky,
however, was very fine indeed: darkly conflicted, and beguiling of line.
Other, ‘smaller’ roles were all
taken well, Richard Burkhard’s Tomsky, Daisy Brown’s Masha, and Laura
Zigmantaite’s Governess particularly catching my ear – without that reflecting
negatively upon any of the other singers. It was the Opera Holland Park Chorus,
though, which so often stole the show. Expertly trained, not just musically but
in its Russian too (insofar as I could tell!), by Philip Voldman, and
responding well to detailed direction, choreography (Jamie Neale) included, the
chorus members performed equally well as individuals (highly impressive
waiters, for instance, in the first scene) and corporately. We shall doubtless
see and hear more from many of them.
Ideally, we should have heard a
larger orchestra than the Holland Park pit can accommodate. There were
certainly times when the lack of a greater body of strings detracted from
Tchaikovsky’s Romanticism. However, there is a good deal of (neo-)Classicism to
the score too; that often thrived under Peter Robinson’s direction. The Mozart
pastiche music – which, of course, never quite sounds like Mozart, but gives us
a good idea of Tchaikovsky’s limited understanding of Mozart – came off
particularly well, but so did the obsessive qualities of the score. The City of
London Sinfonia woodwind were on particularly good form, and the strings
performed creditably indeed, given their limitation in number. Opera Holland
Park’s productions tend to evoke above all a splendid sense of company, of an
evening that is considerably more than the sum of its parts; this was no
exception.
