Royal Albert Hall
Beethoven –The Creatures of Prometheus, op.43:
Overture
Woolrich – Falling Down (London premiere)Beethoven – Symphony no.9 in D minor, op.125
Margaret Cookhorn
(contrabassoon)
Lucy Crowe (soprano)
Gerhild Romberger
(mezzo-soprano)Pavel Černoch (tenor)
Kostas Smoriginas (bass-baritone)
CBSO Chorus (chorus master:
Simon Halsey)
City of Birmingham Symphony
OrchestraAndris Nelsons (conductor)
The precision of attack in
the opening to Beethoven’s Creatures of
Prometheus Overture signalled thoroughgoing excellence in the contribution
of the CBSO to this concert. I could really find nothing about which to cavil
at the orchestral performance. Andris Nelsons’s conducting, however, remained
distinctly mixed in quality. He eschewed fashionable ideas concerning tempo and
offered a refreshingly slow introduction. The main body of the Overture started
intriguingly post-Mozartian fashion, seeming – surprisingly – to hint at The Marriage of Figaro. However, Rossini
soon, bizarrely, seemed to supplant Mozart, and we found ourselves in the world
of Toscanini. The Beethovenian weight of Klemperer was nowhere to be heard. If ‘Italianate’
Beethoven were your thing, you would probably have liked it more than I did.
John Woolrich’s Falling Down, ‘a capricho for double
bassoon and orchestra’, followed. The solo part was taken by Margaret Cookhorn,
the dedicatee of this piece, first performed by the same forces in 2009 as a
CBSO commission. They all seemed to play it very well indeed; I wish I could
have thought more of the work itself. A colourful, spiky, somewhat Stravinskian
opening augured well, its material reappearing throughout the quarter of an
hour or so. Some harmonies put me in mind a little of Prokofiev, and there was
indeed, something of a balletic quality. Antiphonally placed timpani had an
important role, well taken. But once one is past the interesting ‘experience’
of a concertante piece for contrabassoon, Falling
Down seems, at best, over-extended. There is only so much it can do as a
solo instrument but, more to the point, what soloist and orchestra do soon
seems repetitive. I have responded much more readily to the composer’s
Monteverdi reworkings.
The performance of the Ninth
Symphony grew in stature, but I am afraid this was not – for me, although the
audience in general seemed wildly enthusiastic – that elusive, compelling
modern performance we all crave. Daniel Barenboim’s Proms performance in 2012 was nowhere challenged – not least
since there was no doubt whatsoever in Barenboim’s performance that the work meant something, and something of
crucial, undying importance at that. There was good news in the first movement.
First, it was not taken absurdly fast; nor was it metronomic in its progress.
And yet, despite the undoubted excellence of the CBSO’s playing, I found myself
at a loss as to what the music in performance might actually mean. Too often,
extreme dynamic contrasts – somewhat smoothed over by the notorious Albert Hall
acoustic – seemed just that; why was
a phrase played quite so softly? There was wonderful clarity, enabling woodwind
lines not just to be heard, but to sing. What, however, were they singing
about? There was real menace, though, in the coda, even if it seemed somewhat
to have come from nowhere. Applause: really?!
The Scherzo was taken fast,
very fast: nothing wrong with that. My chief reservation remained, however, and
ultimately this was a smoothly ‘reliable’ performance rather than a revelation.
Where were the anger, the vehemence, the human obstreperousness of Beethoven?
Applause proves still less welcome here. The slow movement was taken at a
convincing tempo, its hushed nobility, with especial thanks to euphonious
woodwind, greatly welcome. I was less convinced that the metaphysical dots were
joined up, or even, sometimes, noticed. Whatever my doubts, though, there was
no denying the beauty of the playing (an intervention from an audience glass towards
the close notwithstanding).
Nelsons forestalled applause,
thank goodness, by moving immediately to the finale. He and the orchestra
fairly sprung into and through its opening: very impressive on its own terms,
although it would surely have hit home harder, had it been properly prepared by
what had gone before. The cellos really dug into their strings too. Nelsons had
them and the double basses paly deliciously softly for their recitative; now, a
true sense of drama announced itself, expectant rather than merely soft.
Bass-baritone Kostas Smoriginas delivered his ‘proper’ recitative, ‘O Freunde …’,
with almost Sarastro-like sincerity and deliberation. I liked the way the
rejection of such ‘Töne’ was no easy decision. The soloists as a whole did a
good job; that there remains a multiplicity of options, and dare, I suggest, a
residual insufficiency to any one quartet, says more about Beethoven’s
strenuousness of vision and humility before his God than performance as such. The
CBSO Chorus, singing from memory, was quite simply outstanding. Weight and
clarity reinforced each other rather than proving, as so often, contradictory
imperatives. Nelsons imparted an unusual sense of narrative propulsion, almost
as if this were an opera, or at least an oratorio: I am not sure what I think
of such a conception, but it was interesting to hear it, and there was no
doubting now the conviction with which it was instantiated. The almost
superhuman clarity of the chorus’s words – ‘Und der Cherub steht vor Gott!’ a
fitting climax to that first section – certainly helped. It was fun, moreover,
to be reminded of the contrabassoon immediately afterwards. (Was that the
tenuous connection with the Woolrich piece?) The infectious quality to the ‘Turkish
March’ brought with it welcome reminiscences of Die Entführung aus dem Serail. And the return to ‘Freude, schöner
Götterfunken’ proved exultant in that deeply moving way that is Beethoven’s
own. (If only the abuse of this work by the European Union had not had me think
of the poor Greeks at this point – but, on second thoughts, that was probably a
good thing too.) If only Nelsons could have started again, and reworked the
meaning he seemed to find here into the earlier movements, especially the first
two, we might have had a great performance. As it stood, there remained a good
deal later on to have us think.
