Garsington Opera House,
Wormsley
Images: Johan Persson Andrew Shore (La Roche), William Dazeeley (Count), Hanna Hipp (Clairon), Miah Persson (Countess), Benjamin Bevan (Major-Domo) |
Flamand
– Sam Furness
Olivier
– Gavan Ring
La
Roche – Andrew Shore
Countess
Madeleine – Miah Persson
Count
– William Dazeley
Clairon
– Hanna Hipp
Major-Domo
– Benjamin Bevan
Italian
Soprano – Nika Gorič
Italian
Tenor – Caspar Singh
Servants
– Richard Bignall, Dominic Bowe, Robert Forrest, Andrew Hamilton, Emanuel
Heitz, Jack Lawrence-Jones, David Lynn, Kieran Rayner
Monsieur
Taupe – Graham Clark
Young
Dabicer – Lowri Shone
Tim
Albery (director)
Tobias
Hoheisel (designs)
Malcolm
Rippeth (lighting)
Laïla
Diallo (choreography)
Garsington Opera Orchestra
Douglas Boyd (conductor)
Who among the younger generation can really imagine a great city like Munich in total darkness, or theatre-goers picking their way through the blacked-out street with the aid of small torches giving off a dim blue light through a narrow slit? All this for the experience of the Capriccio première. They risked being caught in a heavy air raid, yet their yearning to hear Strauss’s music, their desire to be part of a festive occasion and to experience a world of beauty beyond the dangers of war led them to overcome all these material problems... Afterwards it was difficult to relinquish the liberating and uniting atmosphere created by the artistic quality of the new work. But outside the blackened city waited, and one’s way homewards was fraught with potential danger.
With
those words, the director Rudolf Hartmann recalled the 1942 Munich premiere of
Richard Strauss’s final opera, Capriccio. They are not without sugary
romanticism, which tells its own contemporary as well as subsequent story, yet
by the same token, would surely touch all but the stoniest of hearts. (Of the
many, there are alas far too many – especially when it comes to Germany.) Since
first reading them, I have found it difficult to put them and their
implications – some, to borrow from Nietzsche, beyond good and evil – out of
mind when listening to and thinking about Capriccio.
The Servants (Robert Forrest, Jack Lawrence-Jones, Andrew Hamilton, Richard Bignall, Dominic Bowe, David Lynn, Kieran Rayner, Emanuel Heitz) |
Perhaps,
then, it is merely my problem that Tim Albery’s new production seems strangely
uninterested in what for me has become very much part of the work. That despite
a strange claim quoted in the programme: ‘I’ve worked with Tobias Hoheisel, a
London-based German designer, who has a real sensibility for Strauss’s world
and language. We talked a lot about the political context of the opera and
decided that we should not set it in the ruins of a collapsing Europe. We set
it in the time in which it was composed, when so many people were forced into
exile.’ I am far from saying that a performance of any work should always
concern itself with origins, the conditions of its first performance, or indeed
any one time or place. Albery’s distinction, though, makes little sense, for Capriccio was composed during the Second
World War: Europe was – again – collapsing. It was not 1945, but nor was it
1935, let alone 1925. One might accuse Strauss of evasion – although, by this
stage, what on earth was he supposed to do? – but there seems to me here a
degree of evasion here too.
Sam Furness (Flamand), Gavan Ring (Olivier), Andrew Shore (La Roche) |
What
we are left with is a typical rococo palace with more modern touches: costumes
and artwork. The action and conversation – are they the same thing, somewhat different,
even in some respects opposed? should we not at least ask? – proceed straightforwardly.
Everything is well directed on stage, but there is little edge: which only the
ignorant and/or hostile could claim of the work itself. This might seem facile, but the very setting of
the work in France has – and had – resonances. To have, moreover, the Countess
comparing the musical merits of Rameau vis-à-vis Couperin is more telling than many
might think: Brahms might have edited Couperin, but one will struggle to find
his name or his music in Third Reich performances and musicology. Indeed, many composers,
let alone others, would not necessarily have been well acquainted with the
music of eighteenth-century France. Strauss certainly was – and showed through
his composition that he was: sometimes through direct quotation, for instance
the ‘Air italien’ from Les
Indes galantes, when the composer is mentioned, at other times through
allusion. Likewise for Gluck – what are we to make here of a ‘German’ composer
acting as a ‘French’ one? – and much else.
The
apolitical, especially at times such as this, may actually be read as highly
political, whatever Strauss’s – or anyone else’s – straightforward intention. Perhaps
the beauty of the costumes, the Countess (Miah Persson) truly resembling a star
from the Golden Age of Hollywood, the servants’ livery truly impeccable, hints
at something more; perhaps it does not. That ambiguity is welcome, but might we
not have had a little more? One need not have Baldur von Schirach on stage to listen
to the opening sextet – although why not? – to hint at something more
troubling. (The sextet had its private premiere at Schirach’s villa, the Vienna
Gauleiter having helped Strauss
secure his Viennese Belvedere home. In return, moreover, for the composer
playing his part in furthering Viennese musical life, Schirach, the only
defendant other than Albert Speer to speak against Hitler at Nuremberg, had
offered protection for Strauss’s Jewish daughter-in-law, Alice, and his
grandsons.) A challenging
work, ever more so the more one gets to know it and think about it, deserves
perhaps rather more challenge than this. Otherwise, the updating might as well
not have happened; it does not seem in any way to shape, to comment, or even to
frame the drama. More fundamentally, though, I missed the achievement of
Christian von Götz’s Cologne staging, which I saw at the 2007
Edinburgh Festival. There, not only was one forced to confront the work’s
political difficulties; one emerged, at least I did, with ever-greater
admiration for it. (Indeed, it was the aftermath of that experience that set me
on the road to writing a chapter on Capriccio
in my book After Wagner.)
Miah Persson (Countess) |
If
Albery’s production comes across as something for those as unconcerned with
such matters as many have erroneously claimed Strauss to be – non-, even
anti-metropolitan opera – there were many musical rewards to enjoy. That was
true above all for Persson. Her musical line, subtly inflected brought into
greater relief than anything on stage the central question of ‘Word oder Ton?’
This was in every respect, certainly verbal, yet not only so, a superior
performance to that heard in concert from Renée
Fleming a few years ago. (Why are Covent Garden and still more ENO so
hostile to staging Strauss, or at least so reluctant to do so?) The vocal bloom
of her final scene was well prepared, prefigured perhaps more subtly still than
the theme on which Douglas Boyd had proved perhaps just a too insistent in his
orchestral highlighting. That said, if sometimes apparently viewing Strauss’s motivic
technique a little too much as concerned with reminiscence, and not quite enough
as ‘the binding together of a music drama through a dense web of motivic
connections from within’ (Carl Dahlhaus on Wagner), Boyd handled and
communicated the ebb and flow well: no easy task. It was doubtless no
coincidence, given his background as an oboist, that the woodwind of the
excellent Garsington Orchestra were afforded especial opportunity to shine. If
a few more strings would at times have been appreciated, there were no real
grounds for complaint here either; the section certainly came into its own at
climaxes.
Hanna Hipp (Clairon) |
Otherwise,
there was a fine sense of vocal ensemble, Andrew Shore’s typically characterful
La Roche, Hanna Hipp’s rich-toned Clairon, and Graham Clark’s properly scene-stealing
Monsieur Taupe (even without Götz’s yellow star, the escape carriage having
been missed) for me the pick of the bunch. If Albery’s staging perhaps serves
La Roche’s caricatured aesthetics better than his broader role as impresario
and indeed spokesman for broader theatrical values – Max Reinhardt his obvious
(Jewish) inspiration – the opera is such that a thinking audience member cannot
help but reflect upon such matters. Capriccio
is a good deal less fragile, as well as a great deal more political, than it
might seem and than it might have been ‘intended’ to be.