Royal Opera House
Images: (C) ROH 2019/Clive Barda |
Boris Godunov – Bryn Terfel
Andrey Schchelkalov – Boris Pinkhasovich
Andrey Schchelkalov – Boris Pinkhasovich
Nikitch – Jeremy White
Mityukha – Adrian Clarke
Prince Vasily Ivanovich Shuisky
– Roger Honeywell
Pimen – Matthew Rose
Grigory Otrepiev – David Butt
Philip
Hostess of the Inn – Anne Marie
Gibbons
Varlaam – John Tomlinson
Missail – Harry Nicoll
Frontier Guard – Alan Ewing
Xenia – Haegee Lee
Xenia’s Nurse – Fiona Kimm
Fyodor – Joshua Abrams
Boyar – Christopher Lemmings
Holy Fool – Sam Furness
Richard Jones (director)
Miriam Buethner (set designs)
Nicky Gillibrand (costumes)
Mimi Jordan Sherin (lighting)
Ben Wright, Danielle Urbas
(movement)
Gerard Jones (associate
director)
Trinity Boys’ Choir
Royal Opera Chorus and Extra Chorus (chorus master: William Spaulding)
Orchestra of the Royal Opera House
Marc Albrecht (conductor)
Dmitri (David Butt Philip ) and Pimen (Matthew Rose) |
Maybe there is something to be
said after all for the 1869 version of Boris
Godunov. There is obviously a huge amount to be said for what we see and
hear, the problem lying in comparisons with later versions. However, unlike 2016, when Richard Jones’s production had its first outing, I actually felt – as
opposed to being able to come up with an argument in my head – what particular
virtues it might have. It no longer came across as the ‘sketch’ of which I
wrote three years ago, so long as one were able to keep 1872, or indeed aspects
of Rimsky-Korsakov, out of one’s mind. That I was, more or less, speaks perhaps
of still more distinguished performances than last time around – and not only
of greater receptivity on my part during Britain’s own, unending Time of
Troubles.
Shuisky (Roger Honeywell) and Boris (Bryn Terfel) |
That began, I think, at the top
– or rather in the pit. Last time around, Antonio Pappano had offered one of
his better performances at Covent Garden. Marc Albrecht, however, proved surer,
more focused, more grimly fatal, aided by an Orchestra of the Royal Opera House
on fine, impressively dark form. Just what this version in particular needs
then: almost enough to have one shrug at losing the Polish act, if not quite
the clock. The chorus, almost as much the opera’s foundation as the orchestra,
was on good form too: the sound of Mother Russia and her tribulations
resounding from and through multiple pasts: that of the historical Boris
Godunov, nineteenth-century reinventions, and our own. The rawness of its cries
certainly brought out that quality in Mussorgsky’s ‘original’ text. One could
doubtless pick holes, were one so inclined; I admit my lack of competence to
judge the Russian. Neither this chorus nor any non-Slavic one will ever quite
attain that ‘Russian’ sound many have in their heads from recordings, some from
performances too. But so what? This is an opera for the world; if your sole
objection is that it does not sound as you ‘feel’ it should, based upon what
you have heard before, then perhaps the fault may lie with you. Nationalism may
help to ground nineteenth-century opera; it should have no place in twenty-first-century
performance and reception.
Holy Fool (Sam Furness) and children's choir |
The same goes for the stage
performances too, most highly distinguished on their own terms. Bryn Terfel’s
portrayal of Boris seemed to me to have developed considerably from last time,
though it had had much to offer then too. In some ways, his facial expressions,
his haunted demeanour, their combination with vocal delivery seemed to have
drawn closer to a great, non-Russian predecessor in the role, John Tomlinson
(seen at Covent Garden under Semyon Bychkov in 2003). Not that this was
anything other than Terfel’s own portrayal, of course. As Varlaam, Tomlinson
himself proved in finer vocal fettle than I had heard for some time, his as
fully committed a performance as we have come to expect over the years. It was,
perhaps, Matthew Rose as Pimen who offered the finest vocal performance of all,
the monk and chronicler – apparently innocent, but who knows? – brought vividly
to life with surpassing vocal radiance. David Butt Philip’s Grigory benefited
from a typical detailed, intelligent performance, with Roger Honeywell a
properly wheedling Shuisky. This was a Boris
with no weak links, cast from depth, other impressive performances coming
from Jette Parker Young Artist, Haegee Lee and treble, Joshua Abrams, as the
doomed ruler’s children. Sam Furness's Fool rightly held sway in his scene - and perhaps swayed the tsar too.
Boyars, Pimen, and Boris |
Jones’s production has much to
be said for it, especially when compared to more recent stagings I have seen
from him (Katya Kabanova and La Damnation de Faust, for instance). The ritual re-enactment above of
Dmitri’s assassination not only chills, but imparts unity and immediacy. That we
see the re-enactment re-enacted, or threatened to be, below too heightens the
sense of never-ending sorrow, of political and cultural impossibility. The red
hair that marks out erstwhile and present Tsarevichi, as well as pretender
Grigory, is but the most visible strand that seemingly marks out the fate of
all. Lightly nineteenth-century dress reminds us, like Pimen’s chronicle, here
literally writ large, that this is a contested history, in which generation
after generation, not least those of Pushkin and Mussorgsky, will continue to
rewrite to their own purposes. There is no peace in Russia, no peace in the
world at large. It is not, perhaps, a production that has a great deal to say
in and of itself, but it amply permits us to continue on our sorry path, both as
chroniclers and readers.
Murder of Tsarevich Dmitri |
With that, it is goodbye to the
Royal Opera House for me for a little while. Next month, I shall leave the
country again for a while. Will the ‘will of the people’ to which Boris
attributes the Tsarevich’s death continue to prevail? As much and as little as
ever. Who will be tsar when I return? A Godunov, a Shuisky, a Romanov? May God
have mercy on the souls of the crowd, if not those whose Kremlin machinations
have done this to us.