Showing posts with label Barbara Strozzi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barbara Strozzi. Show all posts
Sunday, 8 March 2020
Tuesday, 8 March 2016
Monday, 3 August 2015
Prohaska/Arcangelo/Cohen - Lachrimae, 2 August 2015
Sam Wanamaker Playhouse
Dowland – Lachrimae Pavane
Tarquinio Merula – Hor ch’e tempo di dormirPurcell – The Blessed Virgin’s Expostulation
Cavalli – Gli amori d’Apollo e di Dafne: ‘O più d’ogni richezza’
Giovanni Felice Sances – Usurpator Tiranno
Purcell – Sonata in G minor, Z.807, from Ten Sonatas in Four Parts
Strozzi – Diporti de Euterpe, op.7: ‘Lagrime mie’
Dowland – Flow my Tears
Strozzi – Che si può fare
Salomone Rossi – Sonata terza sopra l’aria romanesca
Purcell – The Fairy Queen: ‘The Plaint: O let me weep’
Scarlatti – Sonata in D minor, K.90, arranged for violin and continuo
Cavalli – La Calisto: ‘Restino imbalsamate’
Purcell – An Evening Hymn
Anna Prohaska (soprano)
ArcangeloJonathan Cohen (director)
I apologise that this will not
be a ‘review’ as such. That is not primarily because Anna Prohaska, the
soloist, is a friend of mine. (I think a lot of nonsense is spoken about such
things. It is the nature of things that, sometimes one has to write about a performance,
a book, a musical work by someone one knows. It may in some ways render the
task more difficult, but it may also afford insights. Honesty is the best
policy here – and indeed anywhere else.) However, I was unable to buy a
programme – the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse ran out very soon, and only offered
them again for the second half, which struck me as extortion – and was thus
unable to follow the texts and translations, and indeed in many cases was
unaware what was being performed. Quite a good test of one’s ear in many ways:
I was delighted to recognise one of Cavalli’s two arias and to guess that he was the composer of another (from a work I thought I knew, but which I clearly do not know well enough!) I was still more delighted to hear works by Barbara Strozzi, whose
music I have long admired, but whom we hear far too little: alas, we all know
why. I wanted simply to post the programme, discovered from Arcangelo’s
website after the event, to remind me what I had seen and heard.
If you
will permit me – and even if not – I should like to say that Anna gave an
intensely dramatic performance, quite befitting the theatrical location. I very
much liked the way the various works fitted together and suggested moods and
even narratives greater than the sum of their parts. A hint, and sometimes more
than that, of the wilder world of the Mediterranean was sometimes present,
especially in Strozzi’s music. (I know I am being ungrateful, but a little
Monteverdi would have been greatly appreciated too. When, however, would that not be the case?) Moreover, whilst I am, as
any regular readers will know, anything but a paid-up member of the period-instrument
lobby, I found Arcangelo’s performances, on their terms and indeed often on
mine, mostly highly convincing, even if I could not quite work out what an arrangement
of a Scarlatti keyboard sonata was doing there. The Playhouse is, whatever its acoustical problems for the performers, an interesting and, yes, beautiful space; I look forward to seeing a play or an opera there. I shall stop now, lest this turn into an actual review, whatever that might be…
Saturday, 5 January 2013
Sampson/Wadsworth - 'Echoes of Venice', 3 January 2013
Wigmore Hall
Monteverdi – Si dolce è’l tormento
Barbara Strozzi – Rissolvetevi pensieri (from op.6)Alessandro Piccinini – Toccata X
Ciaccona in partite variate
Strozzi – L’amante segreto (from op.2)
Giovanni Kapsberger – Libro quarto d’intavolatura di chitarrone: Passacaglia
Strozzi – Che si può fare
Francesca Caccini – Lasciatemi morire
Benedetto Ferrari – Voglio di vita uscir
Piccinini – Toccata VI
Partita variate sopra quest’aria francese detta l’Alemana
Corrente terza
Strozzi – L’Eraclita amoroso (from op.6)
In 1612, Venice ended 45-year old
Monteverdi’s year of unemployment since walking out on Mantua. He’d become
famous through his operas Orfeo and
the lost Arianna [certainly not lost
in 1612!], and defended his ideas in the press, so that most employers were
afraid to take him on. The merchant city state in the north was up for it
though and never regretted it.
Alas, matters did not improve thereafter. It was a rare lapse, though, in terms of the Wigmore Hall’s typically high standards and did not detract unduly from the music, which for the most part spoke very well for itself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)