Images: Stephen Cummiskey/Royal Opera House |
Royal Opera House
Chevalier de la Force – Yann Beuron
Marquis de la Force – Sir Thomas
Allen
Blanche de la Force – Sally Matthews
Thierry – Neil Gillespie
Mme de Croissy – Deborah
Polaski
Sister Constance – Anna Prohaska
Mother Marie – Sophie Koch
M. Javelinot – John Bernays
Mme Lidoine – Emma Bell
Carmelites – Yvonne Barclay,
Katy Batho, Tamsin Coombs, Eileen Hamilton, Anne Osborne, Deborah Peake Jones,
Louise Armit, Andrea Hazell, Elizabeth Key, Kate McCarney, Deborah Pearce
Sister Mathilde – Catherine Carby
Mother Jeanne – Elizabeth Sikora
Chaplain – Alan Oke
First Commissary – David Butt
Philip
Second Commissary – Michel de
Souza
Officer – Ashley Riches
Gaoler – Craig Smith
Robert Carsen (director)
Michael Levine (set designs)
Falk Bauer (costumes)
Jean Kalman (lighting)
Philippe Giradeau (movement)
This was a performance whose
intensity increased almost immeasurably as the evening went on. That seemed to
be as much a matter of the production as the conducting, of the singing as the
orchestral playing, although there were, of course, exceptions. At any rate,
the final scene proved devastating in its combination of abstraction and
directness, the amplified (electronic?) guillotine notwithstanding. Robert
Carsen’s staging, and in this case especially Philippe Giradeau’s movement,
exemplary throughout, frame the action simply and without hysteria, as the equally
exemplary ensemble thins out one by one – until the appearance of Blanche, to
whom Constance reaches out from afar, and then… Yes, the opera veers dangerously
close to sentimentality, and perhaps in some places crosses that boundary, but
the frisson experienced near that boundary is part, though only part, of what
Poulenc is about. Musically, the scene is not quite reducible to the ghost of Œdipus Rex, haunted by an earlier ghost
of Gounod; it is, indeed, its own unforgettable self. And the other influences,
Puccini, Mussorgsky, and Debussy amongst them, never overpower the ‘dialogues’
of the title, with their roots in a very French understanding of plainsong and
religious life. It was not only in the final scene that music, staging, and
performance came together very well indeed, but it was perhaps the finest
example and of course the climax.
If only Carsen’s
understandable interest in the revolutionary crowd did not overpower some of
the other scenes, this would be a great staging indeed; as it stands, Carsen’s divided
attention seems to run along the lines of much (mis-)understanding of the
opera. I do not wish to carp about the role played by the volunteer Community
Ensemble, whose direction and performance deeply impressed, and whose
achievement, some of its participants having experienced homelessness, prison,
and long-term unemployment, can hardly fail to move and to cheer. But Carsen’s
presentation tends to suggest that the opera is more ‘about’ the French
Revolution than it really is. This is a drama about Divine Grace, a truth at
least as often forgotten, or overlooked, as the similar truth about Parsifal, a work with which Poulenc’s
opera would otherwise have little or nothing in common. There are moments,
nevertheless, when the ensemble works wonders, perhaps above all acting as a
human – or inhuman? – dividing line between Blanche and her brother, the
Chevalier, when he visits her in the convent. Still, the loss is perhaps a
price worth paying for the redemptive involvement and prospects afforded to
members of the ensemble, who have also been invited to take part in a careers
support programme by the Royal Opera House and its partner organisations
(Streetwise Opera, Synergy Theatre Project, the Department for Work and
Pensions, and the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama).
Mother Marie (Sophie Koch) at the centre |
Sir Simon Rattle’s role in
proceedings was impressive too – as one might expect from this conductor in
French music. Rattle’s leadership of the Orchestra of the Royal Opera House,
generally on very good form itself, refused to sentimentalise, taking the opera
faster than some may have wished, but hardly offensively so and quite without
the mannerisms that so often disfigure his readings of the ‘central’
Austro-German symphonic repertoire. And the big moments had great punch, the
unanimity of orchestral and vocal ensemble alike quite remarkable. Poulenc once
remarked that he did not want his music to be analysed but to loved; perhaps a
better way to love it, though, is to accord it the dignity of some degree of
analytical, as well as dramatic, thought.
Constance (Anna Prohaska) and other Carmelites |
Sally Matthews’s performance
of the central role was one which improved almost out of recognition as the
evening went on. The first scene was troubled by thick vibrato and less than
convincing French. It would be vain to contend that Matthews’s French diction
or style ever truly convinced, but it became possible to leave to one side one’s
doubts, as her dramatic sincerity won one over. Anna Prohaska made a wonderful
foil as Constance: vivacious, pure and clean of tone, yet full of fun. In
short, she simply ‘lived’ the character, convincing us that this was how she
must be; it would be a pity if we were not one day to hear her Blanche. Deborah
Polaski’s Old Prioress impressed through sheer strength of personality, even
if, again, her French was far from beyond reproach. Her
Erwartung did not seem so very
far away at the end of the first act. Emma Bell was sensational as her
replacement, ringing as true and clear as I have ever heard; indeed, this was
the finest performance I have heard from her. Equally distinguished was Sophie
Koch’s Mother Marie: a tricky, yet crucial role. Her inner demons and ultimate
humanity were powerfully portrayed in a reading of vocal distinction too. Yann
Beuron’s Chevalier de la Force made a headstrong and imploring mark, whilst
Alan Oke captured better than I had previously encountered the ambivalent role
of the Chaplain. Indeed, pretty much every one of the smaller roles was well
taken, and the choral singing could hardly be faulted either. This was, then,
whatever quibbles one might have had concerning aspects of Carsen’s production and the French diction,
an excellent company effort, and should be lauded as such.