Images: © Salzburger Festspiele / Monika Rittershaus |
Grosses
Festspielhaus
Die Feldmarschallin Fürstin Werdenberg
– Krassimira Stoyanova
Der Baron Ochs auf Lerchenau – Günther
GroissböckOctavian – Sophie Koch
Herr von Faninal – Adrian Erőd
Sophie – Mojca Erdmann
Jungfer Marianne Leitmetzerin – Silvana Dussmann
Valzacchi – Rudolf Schasching
Annina – Wiebke Lehmkuhl
Police Officer – Tobias Kehrer
The Marschallin’s Major-domo – Franz Supper
Faninal’s Major-domo – Martin Piskorski
A Notary – Dirk Aleschus
A Landlord – Roman Sadnik
A Singer – Stefan Pop
A Milliner – Alexandra Flood
A Vendor of Pets – Franz Gürtelschmied
Leopold – Rupert Grössinger
Lackeys/Waiters – Won Cheol Song, Franz Gruber, Friedrich Springer, Jens Musger
Lerchenauischen – Florian Boberski, Kiril Chobanov, Manuel Grabner, Helmut Höllriegl, Boris Lichtenberger, Christian Schläpfer
House Servant (Mohammed) – Liviu Burz
Harry
Kupfer (director)
Hans
Schavernoch (set designs)Yan Tax (costumes)
Jürgen Hoffmann (lighting)
Thomas Reimer (video design)
Sophie (Mojca Erdmann) and Octavian (Sophie Koch) |
Harry
Kupfer’s production of Der Rosenkavalier
is without a doubt the most thought-provoking of the stagings I saw at this
year’s Salzburg Festival. It intrigued me during the first act, though I was
not really sure how I felt about it; it grew on me during the second, and had
won me over by the third. That seems to be a deliberate strategy, conducted in
tandem with a gradual blossoming of colour from the severe near-monochrome of
the early twentieth-century (time of composition) Marschallin’s palace to the
more colourful inn of the third act, with certain carefully colour making its
point in between. All around, photographs – untrustworthy memories – of celebrated
Viennese landmarks from the Kunsthistorisches Musuem to the Prater make their
point concerning recollection and reimagination. What I felt was missing was a
further layering from an imaginary eighteenth century in which Hofmannsthal –
if not necessarily Strauss – so painstakingly sets the action, but I learned to
live with that, and again, by the time of the third act, had quite forgotten
about it. Perhaps there is a lesson to be learned there too.
For
pretty much all of the action one would (rightly?) expect is present and
correct, except not necessarily quite as one might initially have expected it,
not the least of this opera’s lessons. A particular strength of Kupfer’s
production is its light insistence upon the work’s metatheatricality, less
overt than, say, Ariadne auf Naxos or
Capriccio, but still important to its
layering. One certainly has a good sense of the Marschallin as director, and indeed
as fallible narrator/director. Are the snapshots hers, as might be suggested by
the arrival of her extraordinarily – deliberately so – car at the end of the
third act? What are the implications for agency here? Is she still in control?
And what might that mean for Octavian and Sophie, here directed – and played –
as a much stronger woman than one generally experiences?
The Marschallin (Krassimira Stoyanova) |
The
case of Sophie is especially interesting, since I admit that, in purely vocal
terms, I did not find Mojca Erdmann’s portrayal especially inviting, hearing
more of an Olympia than a Sophie, a strangely mechanical rendering at times.
Yet, somehow, it worked, and the strength of character came across more
strongly than I can recall. For once, it was quite possible to understand why
Octavian might have made the choice he did. Sophie Koch’s portrayal of the role
is well-known and did not disappoint on this occasion, the opera’s play with
gender as captivating as ever. Krassimira Stoyanova presented
a dignified Marschallin: no vulgar playing on the heart-strings here, and
probably all the more moving for it. Moreover, her careful attention to the
words could usefully be aped by certain more fêted exponents of the role. Günther
Groissböck worked hard to present a less caricatured Ochs than one often
suffers. What remained of caricature was probably ineradicable: a pity, but
there is only so much one can do with the part. Groissböck’s was an uncommonly
subtle reading, though, again born of laudable attention to the text. (It is
perhaps a pity, though, that Kupfer seems to want to have Sophie having made up
her mind against him from the very start; a little more contest and development
would not necessarily go amiss.) To start with, I thought Adrian Erőd’s Faninal
a little dry in tone, but that soon ceased to trouble me; perhaps I was just
imagining it. The supporting cast was not always of the highest quality, but
then there is a huge amount to cast here, and much, by the same token, was impressive.
Rudolf Schasching’s coarsely sung Valzacchi was a rare true disappointment;
Wiebke Lehmkuhl’s Annina was much more characterful. Roman Sadnik’s Landlord –
intriguingly, though probably coincidentally, dressed and even very much looking
like the owner of Triangel, the restaurant outside the house – offered a
particularly vivid portrayal, whilst Rupert Grössinger (and Kupfer) made
considerably more of Leopold, Ochs’s son, than is generally the case.
Ochs (Günther Groissböck) |
The performances were originally to
have been conducted by Zubin Mehta, who had to withdraw on medical grounds.
Franz Welser-Möst was a generally efficient, if not exactly inspiring,
replacement, the exception to efficiency lying in an inordinately drawn out
close to the first act. (I thought it was never going to end, and I am rarely
opposed to slower tempi.) It was certainly not a warm reading, but that to an
extent married well with the production, especially earlier on. A little more whipped
cream would not necessarily have done any harm, and there were perhaps a few
more discrepancies between pit and stage than one might have expected. Still,
there was much to savour, and to think about, both from production and from the
performances on stage.