Haus für Mozart
Fierrabras – Michael Schade
Emma – Julia Kleiter
Eginhard – Benjamin Bernheim
Florinda – Dorothea Röschmann
Roland – Markus Werba
Charlemagne – Georg
Zeppenfeld
Boland – Peter Kálmán
Maragond – Marie-Claude
Chappuis
Brutamonte – Manuel Walser
Ogier – Franz Gruber
Two Young Ladies – Secil
Ilker, Wilma Maller
Moorish Captain – Helmut
Höllriegl
Knight – Michael Wilder
Peter Stein (director)
Ferdinand Wögerbauer (set
designs)
Annamaria Heinreich
(costumes)
Joachim Barth (lighting)
We owe the Salzburg Festival –
and Alexander Pereira – a considerable debt for staging Fierrabras. Dedicated to the memory of Claudio Abbado, whose
celebrated Vienna production with Ruth Berghaus, marked a milestone in the
fortunes of Schubert’s opera, this new production will surely have opened new
ears to the work’s considerable virtues, as well as to its undeniable
shortcomings, upon which it is not unreasonable to look with a little
indulgence. Schubert, after all, never had the chance to hear Fierrabras performed, despite a
commission from the Kärtnertortheater, and despite its staging having been
advertised. (The ‘failure’ of Weber’s Euryanthe
seems to have been a factor in dissuading the theatre’s director, Domenico
Barbaia, from staging another new German Romantic opera, likewise the perennial
Viennese problem of Italian singers having supplanted Germans. Look at the
Vienna State Opera today, and wonder at the proportion of nineteenth-century
Italian opera on the menu!) Indeed, although excerpts were heard in concert in
Vienna in 1835 and 1858, the opera would not be staged until 1897, in Karlsruhe
– and then in a version in which both words and music were ‘revised’, the
latter by Felix Mottl.
This production was originally
to have been conducted by Nikolaus Harnoncourt. His replacement by Ingo
Metzmacher will doubtless have been a matter of sadness for some, though
certainly not for me. I can happily do without speed bumps, arbitrary caesuras,
and the like. In Metzmacher, Schubert certainly found a committed advocate,
both in words – in a fascinating programme note – and in the pit. If there were
moments when I felt the lack of something grandeur, perhaps recalling at least
subconsciously the wondrous
symphonic Schubert of the morning before, from the Vienna Philharmonic and
Riccardo Muti, then not only would it be curmudgeonly to cavil; one could also
make an argument that something a little more modest was truer to this
particular work, whatever its ‘heroic’ trappings. (Not that I necessarily
should subscribe to such a claim, but it is not inherently implausible.) At any
rate, once past a slightly plodding account of the overture, which sounded more
exciting in Metzmacher’s prose description, the conductor’s ear for harmony and
its dramatic implications proved invaluable. He seemed most inspired by the
passages which, I later read, he considered most inspired of all: for instance,
the music for the Moorish princess, Florinda, perhaps above all in the
melodrama at the end of the second act, ‘a passage that climaxes in the
unfathomable,’ though, one might add, not unusual for Schubert, ‘key of E-flat
minor’. For Metzmacher, although ‘much ink has been spilt over the question
whether Schubert was ever really able to write an opera,’ this melodrama would
leave no one entertaining ‘any doubts on the matter’. It was certainly
fortunate in the playing of the VPO, old hands in Schubert, if not necessarily
in his operas.
So long, then, as one does
not expect the Schubert of his greatest songs, or indeed of the chamber and
piano music, one has no real need to be musically disappointed. One of the
oddities of much of the music is how, whilst one can believe the composer to be
Schubert, it does not sound so very much like much of the rest of his œuvre.
Likewise, so long as one does not expect Mozartian characterisation, the drama
can be dealt with – at least on that level. Its Orientalism is undoubtedly
problematical for a modern audience, but that may prove a spur to interesting
stage direction. (I shall leave that matter just for the moment.) We should,
moreover, consider this an interesting early work, had Schubert lived longer.
Of course, we have what we have, and there is no point in performing something
on the basis that we are sure the composer would eventually have written
something better, but it is perhaps a particular reason for charitable
reception in this case. The work as it stands is in any case a manifestly
better work than many from the same period, and indeed from later, which
continue to hold the stage. Less than top-drawer Schubert remains infinitely
preferable to any Donizetti or Verdi.
Florinda (Dorothea Röschmann), Eginhard (Benjamin Bernheim), Roland (Markus Werba), chorus |
Other than Schade, the
principal problem lies with Peter Stein’s production. Whatever has happened to
him? I have heard tales, all of them rueful, of his recent stagings, but admit
to wondering whether they might have been exaggerated, or at least to whether there
might be more to salvage. Alas not. The stage business often resembles a
well-budgeted school play. There are cod-mediæval costumes and flimsy
backdrops, which most would have thought so ludicrous that they must be
intended to be sent up, or deconstructed. And that is about it. Of
deconstruction there is not a sign. There is certainly no attempt to address
the ‘Orientalist’ problem. Does Stein really think it does not matter? One
shudders to think how he might approach The
Merchant of Venice. It may be an all-too-obvious
route, but a setting in the contemporary Middle East would surely have offered
more opportunity for reflection than this. Watching Stein’s staging seems less
a matter of viewing through a time warp, than of capitulation to those who
think that productions of the past were simply a matter of ‘pretty’ stage
design and costumes. There is no denying the drawback of the staging, but at
least one was free to imagine what might have been, or what might yet be. The
music was the thing, and it was well served.